🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday went kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously went for Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.